Monday, April 20, 2015

The Oracle to Habakkuk, Part 8: The First Woe - Economic

Imagine the cry of a mother who has just lost a child in a sudden and unexpected way.  Her voice fissures open into a gaping maw of grief as the very soul seems to be torn out of her body.  A wail pierces the air with a scream that seems almost inhuman due to the incredulity of such a sound echoing from a person’s throat.  We imagine the poor woman’s vocal cords shredding inside her neck as her voice fragments and shatters into a million pieces that crash against our eardrums like an avalanche.  The howling stretches on for what seems to be an eternity before guttering out like a spent candle as the breath in her lungs is finally exhausted.  She continues to mourn silently with her mouth wide open, body unable to produce any further aural indicators of torment.  But the eyes tell a tale of anguish that summits the highest peak of human misery.  Many of us have read descriptions of this type of heart-breaking occurrence.  Perhaps we have seen and heard these horrors on live television.  In some cases our life experiences may have brought us into direct contact with such a disaster.  Or, if we have been personally visited by death, our own history may be called to remembrance by this description.

The Bible is no stranger to depictions of grief and human suffering.  The book of Lamentations echoes across history as one man’s encounter with sorrow.  The prophet Jeremiah lived through both the two and a half year siege as well as the complete destruction of the city of Jerusalem at the hands of the conquering Babylonian army.  He recorded his experiences to serve as a record of what it means to drink the cup of God’s fury to the dregs.  Lamentations 4:4 says “the tongue of the infant cleaves to the roof of its mouth because of thirst” and verse 10 reveals “the hands of compassionate women boiled their own children; they became food for them”.  Isaiah prophesied of this event in 51:17 of his book: Arise, O Jerusalem, you who have drunk from the Lord’s hand the cup of His anger; the chalice of reeling you have drained to the dregs.  Jeremiah goes on in chapter 5 of Lamentations to describe the fullness of the experiences of the Jews who endured this punishment:
Remember, O Lord, what has befallen us;
Look, and see our reproach!
Our inheritance has been turned over to strangers,
Our houses to aliens.
We have become orphans without a father,
Our mothers are like widows.
We have to pay for our drinking water,
Our wood comes to us at a price.
Our pursuers are at our necks;
We are worn out, there is no rest for us.
We have submitted to Egypt and Assyria to get enough bread.
Our fathers sinned, and are no more;
It is we who have borne their iniquities.
Slaves rule over us;
There is no one to deliver us from their hand.
We get our bread at the risk of our lives
Because of the sword in the wilderness.
Our skin has become as hot as an oven,
Because of the burning heat of famine.
They ravished the women in Zion,
The virgins in the cities of Judah.
Princes were hung by their hands;
Elders were not respected.
Young men worked at the grinding mill,
And youths stumbled under loads of wood.
Elders are gone from the gate,
Young men from their music.
The joy of our hearts has ceased;
Our dancing has been turned into mourning.
The crown has fallen from our head;
Woe to us, for we have sinned!

At the end of his lament the prophet utters the phrase “Woe to us”.  This was an expression of deep anguish.  The Hebrew for woe is ‘owy.  It literally means “a passionate cry of grief or despair” and the pronunciation, o’-ee, even sounds like a wail or lament.  The view here is of the mother mentioned previously, who has lost her child, and whose senses are overwhelmed with sadness.

‘Owy has an alternate form, howy.  It is pronounced very similarly to its cousin.  But where ‘owy is typically directed internally at deep emotion experienced by oneself, howy is often sent in the direction of another.  An example of this can be found in 1 Kings 13:30.  An unnamed prophet from Judah has come north to prophesy against Jeroboam king of Israel.  God commanded him to “eat no bread, nor drink water there; do not return by going the way which you came.”  But the prophet disobeyed the Lord’s instructions and stayed with a fellow prophet and ate with him.  As punishment God caused a lion to attack and kill him on the way back to Judah.  And when his brother Israelite prophet discovered the body he uttered this epithet: “Alas, my brother!”  This is the sense of the Hebrew howy.  And this is the choice of words, translated in most English versions as “woe”, which God points in the direction of the Babylonians as He reveals to Habakkuk the future doom that will befall them.

God has already set the stage for His judgment with a prologue in verses 2 through 5 of chapter 2 of the book of Habakkuk.  We have seen how He applies against the Chaldeans a description of a proud and haughty man, distorted and corrupted, an aberration of nature itself.  This man is like a drunk, always seeking hopelessly for his next fix, continually consumed by his addiction, but like death itself never satisfied.  And God identifies the Babylonian conquests as the item at issue here when He says that this drunkard will “gather to himself all nations and collect to himself all peoples”.  It is important to clearly identify Babylon as the target of God’s description.  Without that context in mind the meaning of verse 6a would be unclear:

                        “Will not all of these take up a taunt-song against him,
                        Even mockery and insinuations against him

“Will not all of these” refers to all those people who have been “gathered and collected” by Nebuchadnezzar and his minions.  The Lord says that these victims of the Babylonian conquests will have occasion to rise up against their oppressors.  The idea is that in the due course of time those who have fallen under the dominion of Babylon will have their opportunity to turn the tables.  They will taunt, mock, and ridicule their former masters.  But this is not to be seen as literal.  Rather it is a symbolic word picture of divine discipline, continuing the image the Lord has already begun in verse 5.  In effect, it is God Himself who is taking up a taunt-song against the Chaldeans.

And what a taunt it is.  The language used by God here is repeated in Ezekiel 14.  In this passage a warning is being given to idolatrous Israel.  Verse 6 says they are to “repent and turn away from your idols and turn your faces away from all your abominations”.  Then in verse 7 the Lord targets anyone who, rather than obeying this command, “separates himself from God, sets up idols in his heart, puts before his face the stumbling block of his iniquity, and then comes to the prophet to inquire of Me for himself”.  He says of such a person in verse 8: “I will set My face against that man and make him a sign and a proverb, and I will cut him off from among My people.”  This cutting off and making a sign and a byword is the same phrasing used in Habakkuk 2:6.

But the full force and impact of God’s condemnation here cannot be seen unless we look more closely at just how He described the future of Israel itself in Deuteronomy 28 and Jeremiah 24.  In the former passage Moses warns the children of Israel against disobedience.  He says in verse 15 that if they do not obey the Lord their God then a series of curses will come up them and overtake them.  These curses run the gamut. They will be cursed in the city and cursed in the country.  Their baskets and kneading bowls will be cursed.  Their offspring and their produce will be cursed.  They will be cursed when they come in and cursed when they go out.  In all, from verse 15 to verse 36 Moses lists 31 different cursed examples of the judgment of God upon His people if they should choose to disobey Him.  And then in verse 37 He says: You shall become a horror, a proverb, and a taunt among all the people where the Lord drives you.  Far from paying attention to these warnings the successive generations of Israelites grew worse and worse as they delved deeper and deeper into wanton gratification of their sinful godless desires.  Finally, after the northern kingdom of Israel has long since been destroyed and Judah, all that remains of the nation state of Israel, is teetering on the brink of destruction themselves, the Lord utters the following painfully explicit prophecy through His mouthpiece in Jeremiah 24:8-9: ‘But like the bad figs which cannot be eaten due to rottenness – indeed, thus says the Lord – so I will abandon Zedekiah king of Judah and his officials, and the remnant of Jerusalem who remain in this land and the ones who dwell in the land of Egypt.  I will make them a terror and an evil for all the kingdoms of the earth, as a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a curse in all places where I will scatter them.’ 
The concept in God’s mind here is that He will so utterly destroy, scatter, exile, and torture Israel that their punishment will transcend the historical time period it occurs in and become legendary.  They will become such an entrenched example of the complete and utter destruction of a people that it will echo across human history and become “a byword”, or a notorious example or embodiment of something.  Judas Iscariot became a byword for traitors and betrayers and Jezebel became a byword for malicious and evil women, to the point that even in the 21st century their names are a part of the vernacular of the world.  Similarly, God is saying here that the Jews themselves will become a byword for a people who were crushed so utterly that their plight would become synonymous with horror and genocide.  Consider how accurate the Lord’s prediction was.  Ever since the final destruction of their homeland in 586 B.C. the Jews have become a homeless vagabond of a race.  They have flitted from country to country, enduring anti-Semitism from every corner, ultimately resulting in the Holocaust of World War 2 in which some six million of them were systematically exterminated in 4 years through the medium of Hitler’s Nazi death machine.  And to this day, although back in their homeland, they continue to bear the brunt of unbridled aggression across the world.  It is this idea of utter condemnation, comprehensive punishment, and historical illustration that God now directs against the Babylonians.
                       
He does so by painting a series of five detailed examples, or taunt-songs, or woes of how His punishment will be played out against this godless nation.  There will be some level of overlap and parallelism across the five woes, as each deals with a sinful rebellion against God and His response to it.  But as we will see each of them touches on a different aspect of the nature of God and His creation.  So although broadly they can all be identified simply as sin on the surface, if one takes the time to look deeper variations of this theme begin to emerge that ultimately traverse a wide spectrum of reality.

The first of these taunts is what I will refer to as the economic woe.  It is the sinful human practice of operating contrary to God’s designation of personal responsibility and culpability in one’s own crimes.  He reveals the substance of it in Habakkuk 2:6b-8:
                        And say, ‘Woe to him who increases what is not his –
                        For how long –
                        And makes himself rich with loans?’
                        “Will not your creditors rise up suddenly,
                        And those who collect from you awaken?
                        Indeed, you will become plunder for them.
                        “Because you have looted many nations,
                        All the remainder of the peoples will loot you –
                        Because of human bloodshed and violence done to the land,
                        To the town and all its inhabitants.

There are two primary themes to be seen in this woe.  The first is the sin of money worship.  God pronounces a curse upon those, such as the Babylonians, who profit from theft.  They take what does not belong to them to increase their personal portfolio of wealth and/or possessions.  He applies a rhetorical question to these people.  “For how long” is not a question at all.  Rather, it is a statement.  The Lord is saying “they will not do this for long.”  Now, with the framework of Biblical pre-eminence that America was founded on, it is probably a no-brainer for most people reading this to affirm what God is saying here.  From our earliest days of church based childhood we were taught the Ten Commandments in Exodus 20; number eight of which is “You shall not steal.”  Even for those not raised in a church, the cultural stigma associated with theft and its associated laws of punishment is usually enough to warn people of the evil of this action.  Beyond that, God Himself has offered no respite to a humanity which typically seeks to rationalize the rightness and marginalize the wrongness of their sins.  He makes clear in Romans 2:15 that even were someone to be completely ignorant of any other source of information spelling out the immorality of their choices, they are still without excuse because “they show the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them”.  God has left no back door for humanity to sneak out of in an effort to avoid His fiery wrath and condemnation.

But again, most people will fall into the first two groups who do in fact have outside influences coordinating with the morality God has ingrained into them to teach them that stealing is wrong.  But be that as it may, as already stated, we are notorious as a race of beings for explaining away that which we choose to ignore about ourselves.  In this case, and as it relates to thievery, we are quite capable of building a web of arguments that result in being convinced of a lie; namely, that certain activities that we enjoy engaging in, although in reality a form of theft, are not really wrong after all.  To illustrate this point, allow me to relate a personal experience.  I once spoke to a prominent Christian leader in the church I was attending.  We were discussing the types of popular entertainment we enjoyed, one of which was a British television show that we both shared an interest in.  This person revealed that they often downloaded episodes of this show prior to their release here in the United States.  File sharing services were utilized for this process, which are web sites or software applications through which unrelated Internet users across the world can upload digital media files for the purpose of sharing them with others of like mind. 

The idea is that if one person obtains a legal copy of the song, movie, television show, etc. in question then they can make it available so that others would not have to procure said item legitimately.  This has been an ongoing war for over a decade now, as the various entertainment industries, with U.S. and international copyright laws on their side, do battle against the Internet public who rail against the restrictions of governmental laws and demand that they be given access to whatever they want whenever they want it.

So the fellow Christian I was speaking with was quite happily right in the middle of this circus, grabbing copies of his beloved show for free.  Although he was not profiting from these acquisitions, copyright laws are very well defined.  It is illegal to engage in these activities, whether an individual thinks such restrictions are fair or not.  And Romans 13:1 makes it crystal clear that we Christians are to be in obedience to the governing authorities who are in charge of us.  The person I was speaking with even went so far as to argue that they had researched the law and found that what they were doing was perfectly acceptable.  The rationalization of sin was running rampant and Satan was giggling quietly in the corner.  Although this particular example may not apply specifically to your life I am quite sure you can see the point and connect the dots of the overarching truth here in order to highlight these sorts of gray areas (which really aren’t gray at all) in your own patterns of behavior.

In addition to this category of sinners, notice the other side of the coin here.  Those who take out loans to make themselves rich rather than earning their profits through work are lumped right in with the thieves.  Now this one really stings.  Here in the U.S. with our multi-billion dollar per year credit card industries where the name of the game is instant gratification, we have a national fascination with charging in order to acquire the goods we want with immediacy rather than working diligently to save the money to make our purchases.  Only the heart of God knows, and probably weeps, over the millions of professing Christians who sacrifice their cheerful giving to the Lord’s work in favor of paying off enormous and out of control credit card debt, unnecessary vehicle loans, extravagant home mortgages, and the like.  And the Lord says that such people are no better than thieves in the grand scheme of things!

Note that the Bible is not enforcing a complete moratorium on loans or credit here.  The idea we should keep in our minds is “irresponsible debt”.  This is debt owed that cannot easily be repaid and places oneself into a cycle of paying off creditors that threatens to bury us under the weight of our own short sightedness.  Notice the phrasing of Psalm 37:21: The wicked borrows and does not pay back.  It is not the borrowing that is expressly classified as wicked.  Rather, it is the failure to pay back the loan.  The Apostle Paul in Romans 13:8 says to “Owe nothing to anyone except to love one another”.  His point is expounded by the previous verse: “Render to all what is due them”.  The point is not to never owe money.  It is to pay back what is owed in a timely manner so that you are free to express love and by so doing fulfill the Law.  Unpayable debt or irresponsible debt makes us a slave to that debt.  It distracts us and chains us to stress and obligation.  Instead of this model of behavior we are to be clear minded and freed to express love and the gospel of Christ. 

Another aspect of this issue is the warning found in James 4:13-14: “Come now, you who say, ‘Today or tomorrow we will go to such and such a city, and spend a year there and engage in business and make a profit.’  Yet you do not know what your life will be like tomorrow.  You are just a vapor that appears for a little while and then vanishes away.  We ought not to live on borrowed time, as it were.  We should not assume anything about our lives in the next minute, let alone in six months or six years.  And the assumption of debt is in principle right in league with that type of mindset.  So while not being a black and white, cut and dried error of behavior, it is also not in lock step with the biblical model presented here. 

A third scriptural angle to view this issue in is very simply the love of money and wealth.  Look at the way verse 6 is phrased: “And makes himself rich with loans”.  Unsatisfied with what is currently possessed, the sinner acquires more and greater quantities of lucre via the medium of debt.  He mismanages what he has and places himself in a precarious financial position in a self-serving addiction to monetary gain.  In Matthew 19:23 Jesus said “Truly I say to you, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven.  Again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”  And in Luke 16:13 He made the following statement: “No servant can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be devoted to one and despise the other.  You cannot serve God and wealth.”

So then, we have ample evidence in the Bible of the wrongness of thinking behind thievery and irresponsible debt.  But now the question must be asked and answered, “Why are these two linked the way they are?”  In the context of this woe against the Babylonians, why does God lump irresponsible debt in with thievery in His condemnation of sinful behavior?  The answer is the second major theme of this taunt-song and the key is in the link formed by the warning against debt.  Picture verse 6b on one side of a chasm.  On this cliff stands the woe against stealing; ‘Woe to him who increases what is not his’.  Across the gap stands verse 7a; ‘Will not your creditors rise up suddenly, and those who collect from you awaken?  Creditors and collectors have nothing to do with theft.  The two by themselves are unrelated.  But when we insert the end of verse 6 as the structure bridging the gap it suddenly makes sense.  The sin of stealing is linked and carried along with the sin of the love of money and its visible evidence, irresponsible debt, across to the other side of the pit where the creditors rise up and the collectors awaken.  God’s point is that just as when we take out loans we cannot repay and face the consequences of repossessions and collection agencies, so also those who engage in theft will face inevitable consequences.

The plunderers will become the plundered.  The looters will become the looted.  The tables will ultimately be turned because of the human bloodshed and violence done to the land, the town, and the inhabitants.  I am going to place myself on a precarious theological limb here and call this “Biblical karma”.  To be clear, karma in its raw form and definition is most assuredly not a concept which comes from the Bible.  Rather, it is sourced in Hinduism and Buddhism.  It is the idea of the sum of a person’s actions in this and previous states of existence which come together and decide their fate in this and future existences.  If that sounds confusing, consider this practical example.  A cruel and selfish man becomes enraged when he is accidentally cut off in traffic by a mother driving a carful of children.  His road rage consumes him and he follows the offending woman to her destination; a department store.  After the man watches her and her gang of offspring leave their vehicle and enter the location he gets out of his car, slashes all four tires, keys both sides of the car, and leaves a nasty note under the windshield wiper filled with hateful language.  Smugly self-satisfied, he drives home and relaxes for the evening.  The next day, out for a walk near his home, he is struck and killed by a city bus.  A follower of eastern religion would say that was karma at work.  Here is a key point though.  In eastern philosophy karma is tied to a belief in reincarnation.  That is, the teaching which says when a person dies their soul is reborn into a new body.  Each time this happens the quality of the new existence is directly impacted by the moral pattern of behavior in the previous existence.  In other words, if you are an evil person in this life you will wind up in a less privileged position in the next life.  This is the significant differentiator that makes the notion of karma completely unbiblical.  Nowhere in the word of God is such a notion of death and rebirth supported.  So it is a very precarious approach to even mention the notion of karma in relation to biblical truth.  In spite of that fact, I am knowingly doing it anyhow purely for the purpose of illustrative example.

With those caveats out of the way, my contention here by calling what God is describing in His woe against the Babylonians “biblical karma” is this.  The idea of karma, although warped and twisted by idolatrous mankind in their distorted religions of Hinduism and Buddhism, has its roots in the absolute reality of how God designed the universe.  It is a biblical principle present everywhere in scripture that man is held accountable for his actions, either immediately or in the due course of time.  From the very beginning of recorded history, in Genesis chapter 3, we see God causing consequences to come into being for the choices and actions of Satan, Eve, and Adam.  Both Adam and his wife attempted to place blame for their rebellion on the shoulders of another.  But God was having none of it.  He handed down individual punishments for each person that fit their crime.  Further on in the historical biblical record, Exodus 17:8-13 records an incident in which Amalek attacked the Israelites, apparently without provocation.  In verse 14 of that chapter God delivers a decisive ruling against the Amalekites: Then the Lord said to Moses, “Write this in a book as a memorial and recite it to Joshua, that I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven.”  Repeatedly throughout the book of Leviticus God says that for each type of crime given description, the one who has sinned “will bear his guilt” or “he will be guilty”.  There is no concept of a passing of the buck in the mind of God as He considers His creation.  What goes around will come around, but only under the direct supervision of the Lord Himself.

So I believe that the nucleus of what has come to be known as karma was miss-appropriated by the human inventors of Hinduism and Buddhism.  They observed the world around them and how things operated; the natural laws if you will that govern the existence of life.  These natural laws were obviously designed and implemented by God long before Buddha and his contemporaries developed their set of truth claims.  Then they took what they saw that God had already super-intended, modified it to fit their own agendas, and slapped a fancy moniker of “karma” on it.  In a sense we might say “God was there first”.  In light of that truth, it is the Lord who has the authentic rights of ownership to the philosophical concept behind the idea of karma.  That is the sense in which I am using the terminology here.  And that is the over-riding concept behind this first woe that He is sending in the direction of the Babylonians in response to Habakkuk.  The prophet is being given a sneak peek if you will, a glimpse into the future that, although lacking details educates him on exactly what will ultimately come to pass in regard to the perplexing usage of the Chaldeans for divine discipline of Judah.


Now then, is there any particular way in which this all relates to us in our present day?  I think the implication is obvious.  We have already seen how God warns against thievery and irresponsible debt.  As stated before, this prohibition probably seems rather obvious.  But beyond the evident there is an overriding truth that God will orchestrate repercussions against those who choose to defy His decrees and engage in evil.  In the case of a non-Christian, Revelation 20:13 states that at the final judgment: the sea gave up the dead which were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead which were in them; and they were judged, every one of them according to their deeds.  Whether it seems that you have skated free and clear for your misdeeds in this life or not, know that ultimate judgment is coming one day.  For the Christian, although our sins may be forgiven, remember that we are now adopted into the family of God.  He is our heavenly Father who is perfectly just.  As such, He will not hesitate to discipline His children when necessary.  Hebrews 12:6 makes this abundantly clear: For those whom the Lord loves He disciplines, and He scourges every son whom He receives.  So remember this warning before you consider following after the world in theft that you convince yourself is not really theft or irresponsible debt designed to gratify your lust for money that you convince yourself is not really wrong because the Bible doesn’t specifically say you can’t incur debt.  Instead, follow after the example given to us by Jesus, whose every thought and intention of the heart was to do the will of His Father.  Because “He is the image of the invisible God” (Col. 1:15) and “the exact representation of His nature” (Heb. 1:3) the qualities of Christ’s character are in perfect alignment with everything we have discussed here from Habakkuk.  Therefore by studying the example left by Jesus we will place ourselves in the best position to also be in alignment with the will of God.                           

Saturday, April 11, 2015

The Oracle to Habakkuk, Part 7: Doing Nothing...By Faith

One thing must be acknowledged at this point.  Habakkuk has definitely had his say.  He has had more than ample opportunity to express his opinions and concerns.  God has been exceedingly gracious and patient in permitting His prophet to express himself.  It is nothing less than divine forbearance any time a human is allowed to pour their heart out to the Lord.  When we consider how high and holy God is and how low and profane we are it is incumbent upon us to admit that by all rights it should not be acceptable for us to even converse with the Almighty.  Psalm 8:3-5 brings this point out very well: When I consider Your heavens, the work of Your fingers, the moon and the stars, which You have ordained; what is man that You take thought of him, and the son of man that You care for Him?  Yet You have made him a little lower than God, and You crown him with glory and majesty!  So the fact that He has allowed Habakkuk to ramble on for half a chapter like this is nothing short of miraculous. 

Furthermore, as we now begin to look at God’s response we will notice that something is conspicuously absent from His words.  At the end of chapter six we saw that Job received a withering rebuke from the Lord after his arrogant demands that completely overstepped his authority.  But here in Habakkuk 2:2-5, as the Lord opens this next portion of the conversation, there is no evidence of any sort of condemnation.  In fact, He responds very specifically and directly to the prophet’s questions.  In a sense, He permits Habakkuk to guide the conversation and positions Himself in a posture of response.  There is no sense of admonishment, no hint of discipline, and no sign of the chastening that Job got.  This is a very convincing further evidence of the correctness of Habakkuk’s approach.  If the man had been in the wrong here, would God really have remained silent about it?  I think not.  In fact, quite often in scripture He responds with immediacy when mankind dishonors Him.  Acts 12:21-23 records an incident in which Herod Antipas was cultivating his self-styled image as god and king, following in the footsteps of his father Herod the Great.  Scripture says that as a result he was immediately struck by an angel of the Lord, eaten by worms, and died.  God does not always act so quickly to correct the arrogance of His creations.  But I find it to be non-credible to suppose that if Habakkuk had been in the wrong with what he said, that God, in the midst of a back and forth personal conversation with him, would have let it slide without comment.

Now then, what exactly is the content of this answer from God?  This passage divides itself neatly into four parts, one per verse from 2:2 to 2:5.  All four of these components carry a unifying theme which undergirds them and serves to communicate the over-arching message that God is trying to open our eyes to.  He begins in verse 2:
                        Then the Lord answered me and said,
                        “Record the vision
                        And inscribe it on tablets,
                        That the one who reads it may run.

The concepts to note in this verse are permanency and clarity.  It is interesting that God orders Habakkuk to write His response on tablets.  The Hebrew is very specific; it means a board, slab, or plank.  This stipulation seems odd because the Jews would have been using papyrus or parchment style scrolls for centuries.  The Egyptians developed papyrus technology around 3,000 B.C. With the notable exception of Mount Sinai and the stone tablets that God wrote on, scrolls and ink were the predominant medium of the written word at the time of Habakkuk.  So what is God getting at here?  Is He being literal with this requirement or does He have a hidden agenda and this is a symbolic instruction to make a point?

There are two possibilities.  One is that the Lord is calling to mind those aforementioned stone tablets originally given to Moses.  Why would He do that?  The original Ten Commandments were sacred to the Israelites.  They were one of the items placed inside the Ark of the Covenant for safe keeping.  They were a most holy relic of the history of God’s interaction with His people.  But by this point at the end of the sixth century B.C. the word, or oracles, of God had been relegated to dusty back storerooms of the temple.  We discussed this back in chapter one.  The reverence and respect due God’s words had largely been lost.  Although Josiah had temporarily lifted their significance one again, with his death and the subsequent descent back into idolatry under Jehoiakim, this notoriety would have been fading quickly.  And this would have been right in line with Habakkuk’s original complaint about the Law being ignored.  So with this instruction of writing upon a tablet God may have been calling to remembrance just how important a thing it was when He chose to speak.

Another possibility can be found in the final line of the verse, which is at first glance rather perplexing.  What in the world does running have to do with anything?  Consider this.  Typically, we in the western world, the United States in particular, tend to think of tablets as huge and heavy blocks as long as a man’s arm, being lugged around by Charlton Heston in the film from the 1950s, The Ten Commandments.  Or perhaps we’ve seen photographs of the Code of Hammurabi, the eight foot tall record made of diorite stone, of one of the first known system of laws in the world.  But often the clay tablets that ancient peoples made use of were much smaller, sometimes even as small as a modern day “tablet” computer (there is a reason they chose that moniker when designing these things).  As such, they could be surprisingly portable and convenient.  So expedient in fact that a runner carrying messages from one city to another could have read the message as he was running.  This may have been what was on God’s mind.

So it seems that the order of the day here is permanency and clarity.  God wants His message to not be lost.  He wants it to be inscribed on human hearts and branded on human minds.  Deuteronomy 11:18 says “You shall therefore impress these words of mine on your heart and on your soul; and you shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontals on your forehead.”  The Lord also wants His missive to be clear and unmistakable.  Psalm 12:6 draws this illustration: The words of the Lord are pure words; as silver tried in a furnace on the earth, refined seven times.  As opposed to a base metal still waiting to be refined, God’s words are undefiled.  They are free from deceit or falsehood.  As such they are worthy to be viewed with undimmed eyes and unquenched spirit.

The next segment of God’s answer is as follows:
                        “For the vision is yet for the appointed time;
                        It hastens toward the goal and it will not fail.
                        Though it tarries, wait for it;
                        For it will certainly come, it will not delay.

There are a couple of items to note here.  The first is that God has decreed a time.  He has fixed a moment.  He has established the parameters for His plans to come to fruition.  And the information contained in the message He is giving Habakkuk has been designated for that fixed instant.  As such, the Lord says that “it”, meaning the vision, “will not fail”.  Let’s stop and think about that for a minute.  Consider the level of control that must be exerted over something in order to make the claim that it will not fail.  And it’s not only a level of control over the specific item in question.  That same degree of oversight must be in place for every single potential extraneous influence that might come into play during the course of the resolution of the event(s) in question.  What we are talking about, in the interest of just making this one statement, is a mastery that is so complete and so final that it is incapable of being questioned.

Much is made in modern Christendom over the question of God’s sovereignty.  Some camps of theologians argue for a God who is sovereign but in such a way that He permits the world to essentially run itself.  He began the work of creation and still oversees it, but not in a minute and finely detailed fashion.  They do not find it conceivable that God could really be specifically ordering each individual drop of water that falls, every plant that grows, all of the atmospheric disturbances that turn into storms, and the thoughts and intentions of every human heart.  Yet is that not exactly what would have to happen for God to be able to say that anything “will not fail”.  How can He be so sure?  What if someone six months from now makes a decision that is outside the scope of what God has decreed?  Does it throw His whole game plan off and He has to resort to plan B?  In the last chapter we looked at just the tip of the iceberg of God’s fiery condemnation of Job’s arrogance.  Look at some of what the Lord says in those four chapters:
  • Job 38:12-13 – God says that He has command of the morning and the dawn, in other words time.
  • Job 38:34-35 – God says that He commands the clouds to give an abundance of water and sends forth lightning.
  • Job 38:39-41 – God says that He provides prey for lions and prepares food for ravens.
  • Job 39:13-18 – God says that the ostrich treats her young casually and cruelly, forgetting them and their needs of safety.  He says she acts like this because He has made her forget wisdom.


Through these and many more examples, the Lord describes a control of His creation that is both vast and fine, broad and narrow, extravagant and subtle.  He demonstrates mastery over such disparate elements as the boundaries of the oceans and the birthing of mountain goats.  And God’s rule over creation extends to mankind as well.  In Exodus 33:19 He told Moses: “I will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show compassion on whom I will show compassion.”  He had already demonstrated this to Moses in Exodus 14:4 when He said: “Thus I will harden Pharaoh’s heart, and he will chase after them; and I will be honored through Pharaoh and all his army, and the Egyptians will know that I am the Lord.”  This God that Habakkuk served was and is fully in command of events on earth.  He, by His own whim and no others, caused Pharaoh to chase after the Israelites to re-capture them, knowing full well that this would result in the destruction of the entire Egyptian army.  This is a hard lesson but it is who God has revealed Himself to be, whether we understand it or not.  And most especially whether our cultured, modern, refined tastes like it or not.

It is precisely because of this absolute sovereignty which God exercises that He tells Habakkuk to wait for the vision to come to pass.  Although it may seem to be taking an exorbitant amount of time to come to fruition, the prophet is instructed to wait patiently for it with the full assurance and confirmation that his wait will not be in vain.  There is an astonishing perspective shift hidden within this command.  Usually, if God is yet to act in a situation, our tendency is to approach it mentally from a standpoint of waiting.  We wait for the circumstance to resolve itself.  We wait for God to intervene.  We even wait for the patience to continue waiting with patience.  In all of this waiting we are naturally inclined to view God’s involvement as taking a long time to develop.  The more desperately we want something the more it seems that He is taking forever to bring it to pass.  But this is a fallacy of human perception and thinking.  All events, being decreed by God, occur at precisely the moment He has chosen for them.  Observe the wisdom of the preacher in Ecclesiastes 3:11: He has made everything appropriate in its time.  All of His decrees, decisions, stratagems, and devices are appointed.  They will certainly come to pass.  That means if something that we want to happen is not happening yet it is specifically because God does not wish it to happen yet.  Even the yearning for the thing and the longing we feel, oftentimes without satisfaction, has been placed there by God.  The remainder of Ecclesiastes 3:11 says: He has also set eternity in their heart, yet so that man will not find out the work which God has done from the beginning even to the end.  There is no facet of life that God has not ordered according to His desires.

Following this revelation of sovereignty, God then proceeds to give Habakkuk a picture of the very soul of mankind.
                        “Behold, as for the proud one,
                        His soul is not right within him;
                        But the righteous will live by his faith.

Notice what is being communicated here.  A contrast is being drawn between two opposites.  God is indicating that a person who is prideful is distorted or twisted.  The Hebrew literally means to be swelled up or heedless or show presumption.  Over against those who evidence such behavior are presented those, called “the righteous”, who live by their faith.  What is the contrast here?  Why are the proud compared with the faithful?  Having faith is intrinsically a demonstration of humility.  To place one’s trust in something or someone outside of you is to place yourself into a position of dependence.  If you are not the primary driver behind the wheel of the car then you have to submit your safety and well-being to the skills and abilities of the one doing the driving.  This is what it means to live by faith.  And God is saying that if we refuse to do that, then not only are we proud but our very souls are not right within us.  They are corrupted.  To put it another way, to live without faith is to be an aberration of nature.

Why would this be?  Why does a lack of faith qualify one as an anomaly?  Because God designed us to live in and by faith.  He designed humans to be in communion with Him.  And to be in communion with God is to automatically be placed into a position of being less than the one you are in harmony with.  Thus being in accord with the Lord is to be inherently in a position of faith and trust and that is how He designed us to operate.  To function in any other way is to miss the mark.

To further emphasize this point God now presents His own word picture, in contrast with Habakkuk’s fish and fishermen illustration, to both respond to His prophet’s concerns and continue to build His own case:
                        “Furthermore, wine betrays the haughty man,
                        So that he does not stay at home.
                        He enlarges his appetite like Sheol,
                        And he is like death, never satisfied.
                        He also gathers to himself all nations
                        And collects to himself all peoples.

The Babylonians are likened to a drunk man.  This drunk is betrayed by the alcohol he so desperately craves.  He is never at rest, never peaceful, always on the move.  And although that may seem appealing on the surface, in reality it is a curse that stems from discontent.  We are often dissatisfied with the normality of our lives.  We long to be out from under the burden of responsibilities, commitments, and pressures.  In our minds we fantasize about how wonderful it would be to fly free, unhindered by the trappings of civilization which hold us in bondage.  Have you ever wondered by vacations are so appealing to people?  It’s because they offer us a temporary reprieve from the mundane.  An escape from the humdrum.  They give us a teasing glimpse of this mythical land of freedom that we so desperately long for.

But the grim reality is that this idea of freedom and escape is a myth.  It is an illusion fostered upon our consciousness by the sin that consumes us.  And like death, this constant thirst for more freedom, more entertainment, more scratching of our psychological itches, will never be satisfied with the material.  In His word picture God likens our craving unto death itself, who is never satisfied with the harvest it has reaped so far.  There is always the drive to keep going, just over the next hill, to find the next fix.  And so we gather to us that which we think will satisfy us in an endless cycle of self-indulgence and materialism.

The Lord finishes His picture by explicitly referring back to Habakkuk’s concerns about the Babylonians with the description of our drunk gathering to himself all nations and collecting to himself all peoples, just like death.  This mirrors the prophet’s characterization of the Babylonians as fishermen who continually sacrifice to their nets and repeat the cycle of gathering up human fish, without end.  In the same way death is inexorable.  It respects neither class or training, age or intelligence, health or money.  It is the great equalizer that comes to us all in the end.

This portion of the Lord’s answer and the four parts that it is comprised of can be seen on two levels.  On one, which He will develop further with the rest of the chapter, He is specifically addressing the Chaldeans.  He is assuring Habakkuk that ultimately they will come to naught.  In the end, God has decreed what will happen.  It is completely outside the sphere of influence of either Habakkuk or the pagans.  And His words, although they may seem a long time in coming to pass, will happen at exactly the time that He has ordained for them to occur.  Further, the Chaldeans, in their quest for material wealth and power, will ultimately bear the curse of their idolatry in their own flesh.  Their very souls are corrupted and twisted.  They are not upright within themselves.  So even though they may appear on the surface to be content, prosperous, and powerful they will ultimately be left empty, devoid of meaning to their existence, and in the due course of time victims to the specter of death.

This response may seem unpalatable to us.  God is essentially saying, “Don’t worry about the Chaldeans.  It doesn’t matter what they do now because in the end they’ll get what’s coming to them.”  Hardly re-assuring perhaps for a Jewish prophet who will be watching his country burn in a few short years.  And probably not very comforting for we in our modern day, dealing with cancer, bankruptcy, apostatizing children, lost jobs, broken homes, flat tires, high blood pressure, and a country that seems hell bent on going to hell.  What we most want is for God to solve the problems we bring to Him with immediacy and finality.  We don’t want to be told that God doesn’t necessarily have any intention of relieving the day to day stresses and pressures we face.

But that is exactly the point.  And it is the second level on which God’s reply operates; as an address not just to Habakkuk about the Babylonians, but to all of humanity about the reality of their lives.  The beauty of this is that it both condemns and exhorts, warns and encourages, promises alternatively frustration and exhaustion or bliss and contentment.  The key differentiator is which side of the “trusting God” fence you come down on.

If you regard lightly and frivolously the words of God then you face His wrath.  Be not in spirit like Jehoiakim, king of Judah, was in deed when he burned the scroll of Jeremiah as it was read to him.  In Jeremiah 36:29-31 the Lord gave this foolish king the following response: And concerning Jehoiakim king of Judah you shall say, ‘Thus says the Lord, “You have burned this scroll, saying, ‘Why have you written on it that the king of Babylon will certainly come and destroy this land, and will make man and beast to cease from it?’”  Therefore thus says the Lord concerning Jehoiakim king of Judah, “He shall have no one to sit on the throne of David, and his dead body shall be cast out to the heat of the day and the frost of the night.  I will also punish him and his descendants and his servants for their iniquity, and I will bring on them and the inhabitants of Jerusalem and the men of Judah all the calamity that I have declared to them – but they did not listen.”’”  But on the other hand, if you regard with reverence and devotion the words of God then what Jesus spoke in John 5:24 will be spoken of you: “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.”

And if you refuse to wait for God to act in His own time but instead try to manufacture events to your satisfaction then you will place yourself outside of the will of God Almighty and run the risk of being trampled by that divine will, which is guaranteed to accomplish its purposes.  Be not like King Saul, who disobeyed the Lord in the destruction of the Amalekites in an attempt to manufacture his own riches and comfort.  And then exacerbated his crimes by going to a medium or spiritist, which the Lord had expressly forbidden.  As a result Saul became the adversary of God.  In 1 Samuel 28:16-19 Saul received the following condemnation: Samuel said, “Why then do you ask me, since the Lord has departed from you and has become your adversary?  The Lord has done accordingly as He spoke through me; for the Lord has torn the kingdom out of your hand and given it to your neighbor, to David.  As you did not obey the Lord and did not execute His fierce wrath on Amalek, so the Lord has done this thing to you this day.  Moreover the Lord will also give over Israel along with you into the hands of the Philistines, therefore tomorrow you and your sons will be with me. Indeed the Lord will give over the army of Israel into the hands of the Philistines!”  Instead of acting like Saul, rest on the promises of God, such as the one found in Isaiah 64:4: For from days of old they have not heard or perceived by ear, nor has the eye seen a God besides You, who acts in behalf of the one who waits for Him.

And do not become a twisted mockery of what God created you to be by being a proud person of no faith.  Do not be foolish like Christ’s disciples in Luke 8:22-25: Now on one of those days Jesus and His disciples got into a boat, and He said to them, “Let us go over to the other side of the lake.” So they launched out. But as they were sailing along He fell asleep; and a fierce gale of wind descended on the lake, and they began to be swamped and to be in danger. They came to Jesus and woke Him up, saying, “Master, Master, we are perishing!” And He got up and rebuked the wind and the surging waves, and they stopped, and it became calm. And He said to them, “Where is your faith?” They were fearful and amazed, saying to one another, “Who then is this, that He commands even the winds and the water, and they obey Him?”  Rather, be like the centurion who, in Matthew 8:8-10, in spite of his pagan Gentile heritage displayed greater faith than the Israelite children of promise: But the centurion said, “Lord, I am not worthy for You to come under my roof, but just say the word, and my servant will be healed.  For I also am a man under authority, with soldiers under me; and I say to this one, ‘Go!’ and he goes, and to another, ‘Come!’ and he comes, and to my slave, ‘Do this!’ and he does it.” Now when Jesus heard this, He marveled and said to those who were following, “Truly I say to you, I have not found such great faith with anyone in Israel.

Finally, do not be consumed by the pleasures of this world and ultimately, whether in this life or the next, become destitute as the prodigal son was in Luke 15:14: Now when he had spent everything, a severe famine occurred in that country, and he began to be impoverished.  Rather, follow the example of Jesus in John 4:34 by making obedience to the Father your food and drink: Jesus said to them, “My food is to do the will of Him who sent Me and to accomplish His work. 

In all four of these areas there is a duality of application.  You can give heed to the words of the Lord and experience peace, joy, contentment, and security.  Or you can ignore His instructions and experience conflict, despair, suffering, and chaos.  Ultimately, it comes down to a single question.  Will you trust God? 

Each of the four segments of the beginning of His response to Habakkuk revolves on the fulcrum of that most important of all issues.  The Lord instructed Habakkuk to record His words in such a way that they were securely stored and easily accessible because the foundation upon which trusting God is built is a reverence and adherence to His revelation.  He advised Habakkuk to wait for the prescribed and ordained fulfillment of the vision, regardless of how long in human terms it took to be accomplished, because it is critical for us to realize that a sovereign God’s timetable is not ours.  He does not order and orchestrate events in such a way as to appease our impatience.  And it requires trust on our part to hold fast to that truth in the midst of the storms of life.  God described those who are prideful and lacking faith as distorted and corrupted because He created us as beings of faith who depend on Him for everything.  To be and act in a manner contrary to this design is to be a pale and shallow reflection of our original blueprint.  And God painted a bleak word picture of addiction and ultimately doom to describe those who pursue profane rather than sacred solutions to their appetites because placing our faith and trust in things of this earth where moth and rust destroy and thieves break in and steal will guarantee us lives of dissatisfaction, never achieving the lasting bliss we long for, which will eventually result in an eternity of the same empty existence. 


Will you humble yourself and trust the Lord or will you insist on placing your own wisdom on a pedestal that drives you to be heedless of the wisdom of God?  This is essentially the question He posed to Habakkuk and it echoes across the expanse of time to us today as well.

Saturday, April 4, 2015

The Oracle to Habakkuk, Part 6: Flabbergasted!

Have you ever felt flabbergasted? I’m certain you have, although you may not realize it. It’s a relatively modern word, seeing its first use in 1772. But Merriam-Webster reports that flabbergast is in the bottom 50% of word lookups on its web site. So in spite of its recent heritage, chances are you may not have ever heard this term before. However, the emotion is actually quite common. Flabbergast means “to overwhelm with shock, surprise, or wonder.” As mentioned in chapter 4 this has to be how the prophet Habakkuk was feeling when he wrote chapter 1, verses 12 to 17 of his book. Yet as we have seen, he opened his response to God not with human frustration or anger, but with a testimonial of God’s character and how he trusted Him to do what was right.

Because of this I have spent the last two chapters extolling the virtues of his approach. And those virtues are certainly well founded because their focus is squarely upon God. That being said, this prophet was still only a man. And in the latter half of verse 13 through verse 17 we finally see what appears to be a small chink in the armor of his faith. In these verses he openly questions God’s judgment in the matter of Judah and the Chaldean punishment to come. And the form of his questioning is, at first glance, very man centered in its structure. But by digging beneath the surface a picture will emerge to show that even here at his most vulnerable Habakkuk continues to point the way toward a God oriented world view that exalts the creator rather than the creature.

Let’s begin by examining Habakkuk’s argument in detail. He begins right on the tail end of the passage from the last chapter; in the middle of the verse in fact:
                         Why do You look with favor
                         On those who deal treacherously?
                         Why are You silent when the wicked swallow up
                         Those more righteous than they?

We can really feel Habakkuk’s confusion here. He is completely puzzled as to how rewards can, apparently, result from evil. Notice the two angles he approaches this from; God’s favor and His silence.

Habakkuk believes that the Chaldeans are receiving rewards in spite of the fact that they are a deceptive nation who deals unfaithfully with those who they come into contact with. Seeds of a typical human desire for gratification are showing here through the soil of Habakkuk’s question. Our way is to expect recompense for effort given. If we do someone a favor our natural inclination is to expect them to reward us. Either by a reciprocal favor, a gift, accolades, or even a personal acknowledgement of our “greatness”, we want to have our egos stroked and our pride inflated. And woe to the person who neglects to meet our pre-conceived notions and lofty expectations. In the event that our desires are not satisfied the result is often bitterness, anger, or even retaliation.

In Habakkuk’s case there seems to be an implied assertion here relating to his expectations of how God “should” be acting. He specifically mentions God looking with favor on the treacherous. But the unspoken corollary to that is that God is looking with disfavor on the righteous. He just cannot fathom how the nation of Judah, although fallen far from the mark God had set for them, who were still the people of Yahweh and who even in their sinfulness were still “better” than the nations surrounding them, could be met with a divine response that didn’t match his anticipation. And by contrast, he is astonished that the Chaldeans of all people, who were about as far from righteousness as you could get, could be rewarded with wealth, power, prosperity, and conquest.

This makes it all the more apparent that Habakkuk, in spite of his profession of the holiness of God, still just doesn’t completely get it. We considered in the last chapter how humanity has a fundamental inability to comprehend God’s pure and transcendent character due to our fallen existence. We have no frame of reference with which to understand what it means that God is holy because we have never experienced true holiness in a real and meaningful way. Watching a video of a roller coaster is not the same as actually riding that roller coaster. In the same way, reading that God is holy is not the same as actually experiencing holiness ourselves. This is on full display here in Habakkuk’s implied assertion that His people were still better than others even in the midst of their sinfulness.

A perfect example of this type of humanistic thinking can be found in the early church after Pentecost. The book of Acts records for us the life and times of these believers in the heady days immediately following the supernatural outpouring of the Holy Spirit. In Acts 2:44-47 we see a utopian view of the inner workings of these early believers: And all those who had believed were together and had all things in common; and they began selling their property and possessions and were sharing them with all, as anyone might have need. Day by day continuing with one mind in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, they were taking their meals together with gladness and sincerity of heart, praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who were being saved. This is an incredible tableau of human harmony such as has rarely been seen in recorded history. But it didn’t take long before sinful pride and arrogance crept into the picture. If we jump forward a bit, chapter 6 verse 1 paints an uglier picture: Now at this time while the disciples were increasing in number, a complaint arose on the part of the Hellenistic Jews against the native Hebrews, because their widows were being overlooked in the daily serving of food. Apparently, the Christians who were born and raised in Israel, were showing favoritism to their own. They were giving their widows first pick of the food each day. And remember, we’re not even talking about Jew versus Gentile here such as what comes up later in church history with legalistic requirements relating to circumcision (Acts 15). These are all Jews! But even with a purely Jewish community people found a way to regard themselves as more virtuous than their neighbors. In this case, the native born Hebrews were belittling the Hebrews who had come from somewhere around the Greek speaking Mediterranean world back to their ancestral Israel. We can see shades of this in our own country today. When is the last time you overheard a remark, or even made one yourself, that people of foreign descent have less right to be in the United States than people who were born here? Obviously, this is not a perfect parallel. But the root issue of self-righteousness applies today just as much as it did in the first century A.D. and in the sixth century B.C.

The second angle Habakkuk uses to present his case to God runs parallel to the first. It carries similar thought patterns but also some slight alterations to that basic formula. Namely, he questions why God is quiet while the unrighteous triumph over the righteous. Again we see the seeds of his Jewish national pride coming out here in his befuddlement. He obviously is referring to Judah as the righteous and Babylon as the wicked, or unrighteous. He just cannot imagine why the Lord would use a pagan and godless country to administer justice to His chosen people. As stated in previous chapters, we have to imagine that the chastening Habakkuk had in mind was probably similar to that which he observed under King Josiah. From the prophet’s point of view a spiritual renovation of the country which began internally with the Jewish leadership was undoubtedly a preferred method of fixing the problems he was witnessing.

To add insult to Habakkuk’s perceived injury, his implication here is that it is even more egregious of a slight due to the fact that God is sovereign over these events. The prophet has already made it quite clear his believe that the Lord is in control. In verse 3 he stated that it was God who caused him to see iniquity and look on violence. And in verse 12 he acknowledged that it was by God’s decree that judgment and discipline come. So we know he was not of the view that the Lord had not ordained these events. And that is borne out with the way he phrases his confusion. He says “Why are you silent?” The implication is not that God is mute and unable to speak; far from it.

The Hebrews had around 30 different words for silence. They had a wealth of varied ways of expressing the same theme. So when an ancient Jewish writer uses a word that we translate into English as silent, be still, or quiet it behooves us to dig deeper in an attempt to find out what they really meant. Here the word used is “charash”. There are two usages of it which appear to be completely unrelated. One is cease, deaf, cease speaking, or keep silence. The other is devises, engraved, plotting, or plow. It is in the melding of these two ideas that we arrive at a clearer picture of the prophet’s meaning. That is, a farmer plows his field and sows seeds, then ceases working with an attitude of eager vigilance as he waits for the harvest. In the same way, Habakkuk is describing God as being in a mode of expectant watchfulness. God has prepared the setting and orchestrated the circumstances to His liking. And He is now waiting for events to unfold and observing their progress. So this flavor of silence carries with it a connotation of waiting, of anticipation, of preparedness. We can see this plainly in Exodus 14:14. The situation is that the Israelites are caught between the rock of the Red Sea and the hard place of Pharaoh’s army who have come to re-capture them and take them back to Egypt. It is at this moment, in what is to this point their most desperate hour, that God speaks through Moses: “The Lord will fight for you while you keep silent (charash).” God was not merely telling the people to be quiet. He was telling them to keep silent and watch their God work.

So rather than accusing God of impotence, Habakkuk believes that God is perfectly capable of speaking, in other words acting, in this circumstance and just chooses not to. This is what really gets Habakkuk’s goat, so to speak. It is even more galling to him that God is in this mode of expectant watchfulness, intentionally sitting back and watching the impending doom of His people at the hands of the wicked.

Then, after opening this two pronged inquiry into the Lord’s actions our prophet finishes the opening chapter of his book by taking the themes he has developed and using them to paint a striking word picture to make abundantly clear exactly what he is getting at. Observe verses 14 to 17 of chapter 1:
                         Why have You made men like the fish of the sea,
                          Like creeping things without a ruler over them?
                         The Chaldeans bring all of them up with a hook,
                         Drag them away with their net,
                         And gather them together in their fishing net.
                         Therefore they offer a sacrifice to their net
                         And burn incense to their fishing net;
                         Because through these things their catch is large,
                         And their food is plentiful.
                        Will they therefore empty their net
                         And continually slay nations without sparing?

The image that Habakkuk paints of humanity is not very flattering. He likens us to fish who swim in the sea. But he is not content with a casual description of these creatures. He calls them “creeping things without a ruler”. Creeping things has the idea of movement or gliding. And this swimming is done with no master to oversee them. In other words, in Habakkuk’s mind mankind is like a school of mindless, aimless fish. These fish swim to and fro in the sea with no one to guide them. There is no one to protect them. There is no one to lend reason to their presence. They merely exist for no apparent purpose whatsoever.

Habakkuk’s portrait is already bad enough. But it gets worse. He likens the Chaldeans to fishermen who cast nets and hooks into the water for the purpose of catching the human fish who swim mechanically below them. And catch them they do. Habakkuk doesn’t just limit the Babylonian’s symbolic fishing skills to some of the people in the nations they conquer. It is more than just a random partial sampling. He says they “bring all of them up”, “drag them away”, and “gather them together”.

Then the atrocities continue as Habakkuk turns to the idolatrous practices of the Chaldeans. In his word picture the fishing nets represent the false gods of the Babylonian Empire. And his concern is that due to the unabated success these people are enjoying they will be even more likely to continue to worship their gods (nets). This success and idolatry will, in Habakkuk’s mind, drive the pagans to continue their march of destruction across the world.

Our prophet is probably at his lowest point now. He is dismayed by what God has revealed to him. He doesn’t understand how these future events can possibly promote justice. He doesn’t understand how God can see fit to do things this way. And we begin to see in his diatribe an inkling of man centeredness that has not been present to this point. Unlike his earlier concerns at the beginning of the chapter and even what he just said in the previous verse, Habakkuk is dwelling fixedly upon the human element in what’s going on. He began his conversation with God so well, focusing upon the Lord as the center of all that is. But now he seems to be reverting to an emotional lament over the plight of the people.

The question is, is it right or wrong for Habakkuk to do this? Is he sinning at this point? To reiterate the point I made at the beginning of the chapter, I think the prophet is still on the right track. This is in spite of his humanistic lament that we have just read. The reason I think this is because of how Habakkuk chose to “bookend” his argument. Remember that all of these concerns and word pictures are coming after a glorious, soul stirring, and triumphant exaltation of God’s character. He has already affirmed that he knows God has been present and active in history. He has made clear that he is addressing Yahweh, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. He has made the distinction between this God and the false gods of the world religions around him. He has declared that it is only through God’s correction that life will come. And he has added to that declaration the truth claim that God is a God of justice who is sovereign over the manner and method of the discipline He imparts. Then Habakkuk finishes by zeroing his lenses in on God’s holiness and righteous character. In point of fact, it is all of these things that drive his thinking patterns. It is because of God’s holiness that Habakkuk cannot believe He would look on wickedness with favor. It is because of God’s righteousness that Habakkuk has difficulty understanding how God can apparently reward the treacherous. So even though his complaint here does definitely stink of an exaltation of man and his plight, it would be a disservice to our prophet to somehow forget what he has just communicated about his God which is the same refrain he has been belting out since the beginning of the book.

And if that wasn’t clear enough, consider how he ends his participation in this part of the conversation. Chapter 2 verse 1 seals the deal of the question of where Habakkuk’s heart is:
                         I will stand on my guard post
                        And station myself on the rampart;
                        And I will keep watch to see what He will speak to me,
                        And how I may reply when I am reproved.

Look at this! It is astonishing how Habakkuk finishes up here. And it conclusively eviscerates any argumentation that he was in the wrong in what he said. He doesn’t stand on his guard post and station himself on the rampart in an attitude of defiance. His intention is not to challenge God with insubordination. Think about the choice of words here. When Habakkuk says that he will keep watch, it’s the same word used in 1 Samuel 4:13 to describe Eli. The Ark of the Covenant had been taken into battle against the Philistines in hopes of having success. And Eli was fearful for its safety, probably because he knew it was being used in an unrighteous manner as a sort of magic talisman. So the scripture says “there was Eli sitting on his chair by the side of the road, watching, because his heart feared for the ark of God.” His whole attention was upon the fate of his beloved Ark. In fact, the word doesn’t even carry connotations of physical sight. Eli was 98 years old at this point and blind. So the description of his vigil has nothing to do with eyes. It is more the idea of a focused and pent up observation, like a spring that has been coiled too tightly and is trembling with unreleased energy. That is the same attitude Habakkuk has as he waits for God’s reply. Not only that, but when the reply comes Habakkuk fully expects to be chided. He uses “reproved” at the end of the verse to describe the form that he believes God’s answer will come in. Hosea 5:9 records the following prophecy: “Ephraim will become a desolation in the day of rebuke”. The word rebuke there is the same word we are translating as reproved here in Habakkuk. The obvious implication of the Hosea passage is that God will discipline Israel with righteous wrath. And Habakkuk expects the same thing for himself. He probably senses on some level that his perspective, although mostly right, is skewed somewhat by his fallen humanity. And not only does he understand that he needs an attitude adjustment but he is ready and eager for it. These are not the words of a man who is upright in his own conceit and arrogance.

To get a clearer picture of this we need to look at an example of someone else who also had complaints to level against God and how they handled themselves. The Bible provides just such a specimen in the book of Job. You may recall the account. In the first few chapters the tale is told of how God permits Satan to afflict His servant, Job. The evil one begins by destroying all of Job’s possessions and his family, seemingly on the same day. Raiders carry off some of his livestock and slay the servants. A fire then falls from heaven and burns up more cattle and hired hands. Worst of all, a fierce wind came and struck the house where Job’s children were staying, causing it to collapse and kill them all. In all of this Job maintains his righteous testimony by honoring the Lord even in the midst of his distress. He says in Job 1:21: “The Lord gave and the Lord has taken away. Blessed be the name of the Lord.” So, his plan foiled, Satan returns to God. This time he tries a different approach, still desperate to drag Job down to his level and in so doing dishonor God. He asks for permission to afflict Job’s health. God grants this request, but commands him to spare Job’s life. This time Satan afflicts Job with boils all over his body. Still this righteous man of God stayed true to his master, in 2:10: “Shall we indeed accept good from God and not adversity?” Unfortunately, after beginning so well, Job’s faith finally started to weaken. He suffered with his boils for seven days and then began his lament in chapter 3:
  • 3:1 – Let the day perish on which I was to be born
  • 3:11 – Why did I not die at birth, come forth from the womb and expire?
  • 3:20 – Why is light given to him who suffers?
  • 3:24 – For my groaning comes at the sight of my food, and my cries pour out like water.

The common thread which runs through Job’s words is a focus upon his own misery. He questions his very existence. He complains that God continues to give him light, meaning let him live. He describes his loss of appetite and his mourning. In all of this, it seems at this point that Job’s and Habakkuk’s arguments are very similar. They both began with worship of the Lord. Then they regressed into the voicing of a complaint. We even see similarities in the questions they posed to God. Habakkuk asked why the treacherous were looked on with favor and the schemes of the wicked were met with divine silence. Similarly, in Job 7:20 we read the following: “Have I sinned? What have I done to You, o watcher of men? Why have You set me as Your target, so that I am a burden to myself? What then? Is there any difference in the approach of these two men? The mechanics of their argumentation seem to be similar. Were they both justified in their questions? No, they were not.

They key dissimilarity between Job and Habakkuk was not the nature of their questions. It was the internal heart attitude with which they asked the questions. We have already seen that Habakkuk’s desire was to be corrected by his God. He didn’t understand what was happening and what God was doing. But he recognized his inferiority and asked the Lord to correct him. In stark contrast we read the words of Job in 31:35: “Oh that I had one to hear me! Behold, here is my signature; let the Almighty answer me!” After most of the arguments of his friends were spent Job’s final posture was one of arrogance and defiance. He proclaimed his integrity before God and demanded that he be given an answer, that God explain to him the reasons for what had happened. Habakkuk opened his speech with God, interjected man, and then closed with God once again. Job opened with God, interjected man, and closed with man. To say it another way, Job began well but ended poorly. Habakkuk began and ended well. He wavered a bit in the midst of the storm but ultimately stood firmly and staunchly in the Lord’s corner. This will become even more crystal clear by the end of the book.

This comparison of Job and Habakkuk serves to illustrate an important principle for us to live by. God has created us in His image. He has made us to think, emote, and reason. He instructs us to utilize those resources for His glory. But due to the contamination of sin, all of our human attributes have the potential to be warped, corrupted, and made into traitors against the cause of God. In particular, as it relates to our discussion of Habakkuk, the dangers of reason present themselves. Reason is a good thing. It allows us to solve complex problems. By it we can create amazing inventions. Man is capable of delving into philosophy, spirituality, and ethics, to name just a few disciplines. And this is all by way of our ability to reason. But we must be cautious to never place too high of an emphasis upon our own resources because in so doing the tendency of the sinful human heart is to denigrate God in the process. The typical way it works is this. We reason to the best of our abilities, reach a subsequent conclusion, and then become bold enough to challenge Him and His infinite understanding with our limited capacities. This is exactly what happened in the case of Job. So we should be sobered by God’s response in Job 38:2: “Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge? He proceeds over the next three chapters to completely decimate Job’s human arrogance with a withering assault upon the idea that a mere man has any right whatsoever to question the Lord God Almighty. What the Lord is communicating here is that all of Job’s lofty and poetic, reasoned, arguments are in the end empty and devoid of understanding. Further, this empty headed rambling is a blight upon the thoughts of God. Proverbs 18:2 reinforces the idea: A fool does not delight in understanding, but only in revealing his own mind. And Ecclesiastes 5:2 gets the point across even more plainly: Do not be hasty in word or impulsive in thought to bring up a matter in the presence of God. For God is in heaven and you are on the earth; therefore let your words be few. The issue is a lack of reverence or respect for God. We dare in our ignorance to imagine ourselves on a footing high enough to be qualified to question Him. As Job found out the hard way, coming before God with conceit, posing questions to Him, and demanding answers is a surefire way to be set back on your heels in a hurry; perhaps more drastically than you would like.

However, the beautiful thing about the Lord is that there is a glorious flipside to this issue. Namely, that although He is a holy and just and wrathful God, as we have looked at in previous chapters He is also a loving and patient and compassionate God who delights in the prayer and supplication of His children. In John 16:23 Jesus taught: “Truly, truly, I say to you, if you ask the Father for anything in My name, He will give it to you.” And lest we self-interested humans take that as a blank check to shower God with requests as if He is some sort of genie in a bottle, in verse 7 of the previous chapter He said this: “If you abide in Me, and My words abide in you, ask whatever you wish, and it will be done for you.” There is a pre-requisite for making requests of the living God. We must first align ourselves with His will and submit ourselves to His authority. In so doing we will side-step the human tendency to focus upon ourselves rather than God.

In a beautiful symmetry between Old Testament and New Testament, old covenant and new covenant, Law and Messiah; Zechariah 10:1 presents the same idea with an example from nature: Ask rain from the Lord at the time of the spring rain – The Lord who makes the storm clouds; and He will give them showers of rain, vegetation in the field to each man. God is saying “Don’t ask me to send rain in the dead of winter or in the high heat of summer.” Our response might be “Well, that’s rather obvious, tell me something I don’t already know.” But the underlying message has nothing to do with seasons or irrigation of crops. God’s point is this. He designed spring to be the primary time of watering the earth. The cycle of seasons and the natural workings of the earth are according to His plan. So we are under obligation to conform ourselves to nature the way God has ordained it rather than expecting Him to alter His designs on our account. And in the same way, when we come before Him in prayer He delights to hear us. He is interested in what we are struggling with (He already knows anyhow, so what He takes delight in is our act of veneration in bringing it before Him). He desires for us to, as Psalm 55:22 says: Cast your burden upon the Lord and He will sustain you; He will never allow the righteous to be shaken. But He demands that we do so with an attitude of obeisance.

To conclusively illustrate this with an actual step by step example we will turn to, aside from Jesus, one of the greatest authors of prayer in history; King David. In Psalm 7 he masterfully interweaves worship of God with the realities of his present situation. In fact, he does so in such a symbiotic fashion that often worship and supplication are side by side in the same verse, such as in verse 1: “O Lord my God, in You I have taken refuge; save me from all those who pursue me, and deliver me.” Another example of this can be found in verse 8: “The Lord judges the peoples; vindicate me, O Lord, according to my righteousness and my integrity that is in me” and again in verse 9: “O let the evil of the wicked come to an end, but establish the righteous; for the righteous God tries the hearts and minds.” And just like Habakkuk after him, David’s expectation is to be judged and corrected by God if and when wickedness is found in him, as verses 3-5 makes clear: “O Lord my God, if I have done this, if there is injustice in my hands, if I have rewarded evil to my friend, or have plundered him who without cause was my adversary, let the enemy pursue my soul and overtake it; and let him trample my life down to the ground and lay my glory in the dust.” Finally, after have already seen how David opens his psalm with worship in verse 1, notice how he closes it in verse 17: “I will give thanks to the Lord according to His righteousness and will sing praise to the name of the Lord Most High.” It was according to the standard of God’s righteousness, defined by Him and revealed to us through His oracles, that David based his thanksgiving. It was not according to human wisdom or human suffering, as in the case of Job.

To ascribe greater qualification for beseeching God based on the perceived importance of the human element in the situation is to elevate that human element to a place of equality with God. Rather, the plum line we should use for determining our course should be the character and nature of God. All things relate to Him according to the standards defined by Himself, not the other way around. This was the approach used by King David in his psalm. It is exactly the approach Habakkuk took in Habakkuk 1:12-2:1. And as we will see in the next chapter our prophet received a very different response from God than Job did.