Tuesday, July 12, 2016

The Epistles of John, Part 6: Blessed Assurance Part 2

Let’s take a quick lesson in metallurgy (I know what you’re thinking, but stay with me; this will make sense in a minute).  A noble metal is defined as one that is resistant to corrosion and oxidation in moist air.  The most well-known noble metals are probably gold and silver, due to their additional status as precious metals.  Whether in art, coinage, or jewelry humans have been involved in the acquisition of these lustrous materials for millennia.  History records people working with silver in Mesopotamia as far back as the 4th millennium B.C. 

The catch though, is that most of the time the noble metals are not found in a pure form.  They are mixed with other base metals and must be refined.  The refining process is known as “cupellation”.  This is a method where the metallic substance is heated to a very high temperature.  Once the correct temperature is achieved, the base metals begin to separate from the noble metals.  The reason is because the noble metals, as mentioned above, do not oxidize, meaning they do not react chemically.  So when heat is applied the base metals form slags or other compounds, leaving the more valuable noble metals separate.
In ancient times the container used for this chemical process was known as a “cupel”.  Hence the term “cupellation”.  It was a vessel formed of wood ashes and finely powdered brick dust.  In other words, it was made of earthen materials.  Well, it just so happens that the Latin word for earthen pot is “testa”.  It is the origin of the modern word test.

This is helpful because the history behind it gives us an extremely accurate understanding of the definition of test.  We can say that a test is a method whereby a catalytic agent is applied to a target object for the purpose of identifying (and consequently removing) impurities as well as refining the quality of the object in question.  To take the classic example of an educational test: the student is the target object and a list of questions on a piece of paper is the catalytic agent.  The objective is to pinpoint inaccuracies in the thinking patterns of the pupil so as to eliminate them.  And in the end it is hoped this process will improve the quality of the student’s intellect.

What in the world does that have to do with 1st John?  Well, in the second half of our study of 1st John 2:1-6 the author gives us a rock solid, proven test to determine the status of our salvation.  He has already alluded to this test in chapter 1 verse 7: if we walk in the Light as He Himself is in the Light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus His Son cleanses us from all sin.  And John has given us the grounds, or parameters, within which the test is to be administered.  Namely, that our confidence is in God alone.  As verse 9 of chapter 1 points out, He is faithful and righteous.  Not only that, but chapter 2 and verse 1 teaches us that we have the best legal defense in the universe in the person of Jesus Christ the Righteous.  Furthermore, verse 2 makes it clear that He is the atoning sacrifice which expiates, or cleanses us from sin and causes God to be propitious, or favorable in His regard for us.  All of this has been discussed in previous weeks.

But now John both reiterates what he has hinted at and capitalizes on what he has laid the groundwork for by telling us exactly how to test ourselves so that we can be confident in our status as adopted children of God.  He states the test quite plainly in 1st John 2:6, as follows: the one who says he abides in Him ought himself to walk in the same manner as He walked.  This is really quite obvious and clear.  But the manner in which John leads up to that simple formula and the framework he builds around it is fascinating and I believe will be instructive as well.  He begins in verse 3 with two criteria that must be met prior to beginning the test if we are to be successful.  These pre-requisites result in both a condition and a consequence.  The effect of all this, in John’s mind, ought to be a successfully aced test, every time we take it.  I will move through these four components, one at a time, followed by a final word on the test itself.

Verse 3 of 1st John chapter 2 states: By this we know that we have come to know Him, if we keep His commandments.  The first criterion that a successful salvation test taker must meet is they must know the God who they claim to have received salvation from.  We looked at this concept back in the very first essay of this series but it is important enough that we go over it again here.  The knowledge that John is talking about is probably not the same thing we associate in our minds with that word.  We in the modern western world tend to think logically and pragmatically.  But the Jewish mind in John’s day and culture would have tended to think much more in terms of relationships and principles.  This is why the 
Hebrew Scriptures so often paint word pictures with objects rather than adjectives.  In 2nd Samuel 22:2-3 David sings this hymn to God after being delivered from the hand of King Saul: “The Lord is my rock and my fortress and my deliverer; my God, my rock, in whom I take refuge, my shield and the horn of my salvation, my stronghold and my refuge; my savior, You save me from violence.”  David peppers his song with images that are immediately relatable to a reader in a visual and tangible manner.  By contrast the tendency of a westerner would be to refer to God as powerful, protective, secure, and heroic.  We mean the same things but go about expressing them in a completely different way.

This difference is instructive when it comes to understanding what John has in mind when he refers to knowing God.  John is not talking about a clinical or sterile understanding.  He is not talking about knowing as we might come to know something at school.  Rather, the idea is to understand, perceive, or become acquainted with in an intimate manner.  As stated in that previous essay, the word that John uses for this concept, “ginosko”, was also used by the Jews as an idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman.

An excellent example of this usage is found in John 6:69.  The twelve apostles are asked by Jesus if they want to leave with the crowds who were leaving Him because the message He was preaching was too radical.  Peter, acting as spokesman, responds beginning in verse 68: “Lord, to whom shall we go?  You have words of eternal life.  We have believed and have come to know that You are the Holy One of God.”  The underlined word is the same as what John is using in 1st John 2:3.  Clearly, Peter and the eleven haven’t just heard through the grapevine that Jesus is the holy one of God.  Obviously, their conviction is deeper than the surface level response that most of the crowds had to the miraculous signs and wonders Jesus was performing.  Unmistakably, their education in this matter extends beyond even hearing Jesus make these claims first-hand.

No, Peter’s belief in this passage is one of experience.  He knows that Jesus is the Christ because he has lived through the process of coming to grips with this amazing truth.  And that process has instilled in him and his brothers a deep and abiding persuasion of the truth of what he has just stated.  This is what it means to know as John intends for us to understand it.

This experiential and intimate knowledge is incredibly important to John.  The word “ginosko” appears 49 times, the most of any single book of the New Testament, in the Gospel of John.  And coming in third for most usage is 1st John, at 21 times.  Only Luke, with 28, beats it.  To put it another way, John’s usage of “ginosko” in the relatively few books penned by him accounts for more than half of the overall occurrences of the word in the entire New Testament.

What this tells me is that for John, the “disciple whom the Lord loved”, who rested on His bosom at the last supper, who of all the apostles did not flee in terror from the crucifixion, and who was the one selected to care for Christ’s mother after His death this knowing God is of absolutely paramount importance for us to understand and take part in.

Now here, for me, is the completely mind blowing part.  John says the manner in which we prove that we have come to know God in this way is to obey Him and His commands.  That is just completely opposite of the direction my mind would tend to go in processing the idea of coming to know someone.  I would think that if I want to know a person very well I simply need to spend time with them.  I would have to learn their preferences, their likes and dislikes, and their patterns of behavior.  Now to be sure, these factors are a part of the process.  And they come into play in knowing God as well.  But these elements are not what John chose to focus on.  Much as he will do in verse 6, he strips away all the extraneous details and leaves us with the over-arching umbrella principle that the proof of our knowing God is bound up in the consistency of our obedience to Him.

Interestingly, John doesn’t actually use the word obey in this verse.  Instead, he says that we must “keep His commandments”.  This is an important point to remember.  Because the issue is not offering our obedience to God.  The point is to do as He has said.  Obedience given that is not in accord with the instructions delivered is of no value whatsoever.  Samuel makes this clear in 1st Samuel 15:22: “Has the Lord as much delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices as in obeying the voice of the Lord?  Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to heed than the fat of rams.”  Furthermore, the attitude of our hearts must be penitent and humble before Him before we attempt to follow His commands.  David speaks of this in Psalm 51:16-17: For You do not delight in sacrifice, otherwise I would give it; You are not pleased with burnt offering.  The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart, O God, You will not despise.

The final point I want to make on this verse has to do with the word translated keep.  The Greek behind it means “to attend to carefully” or “to guard”.  Our calling in this situation is not merely to do what God has said.  We must view ourselves as protectors of the sanctity of the Lord’s precepts and instructions.  This implies a level of ownership and participation that goes far beyond just obeying the letter of the law.  In Acts chapter 12 Peter has been imprisoned by King Herod.  Verse 5 says: So Peter was kept in prison.  You can be sure this was no casual activity for the guards who were with him.  In fact, after Peter’s supernatural release at God’s hands, Herod had these guards executed for their failure to keep their prisoner secure.  The guards would have been very well aware of Herod’s reputation and the probable penalty for failure.  So they were undoubtedly doing everything within their power to ensure that the king’s instructions were followed to the letter.  This is the mindset we are to have when keeping God’s commandments.

So we can say from all this that the two requirements we must meet before administering the test of salvation to ourselves is to know God deeply and experientially as well as humbly and penitently obeying exactly what He has commanded while we go above and beyond the call of duty to protect those commands.  If these factors are present within our hearts and are evidenced in our lives then we can expect two results: a condition and a consequence.

The condition can be seen in verse 4: The one who says, “I have come to know Him,” and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.  This is of course a parallel of chapter 1, verses 6, 8, and 10 that we have already discussed.  But what I want to do this time around is look at it in reverse.  In other words, it is clear that if we make a claim of knowing God, yet we do not obey His instructions, we are liars.  But what does that imply about the opposite situation?  Put simply, if we claim to know God and we do keep His commands, then the truth is in us rather than not in us.  Let’s re-phrase the verse to illustrate this: The one who says, “I have come to know Him,” and keeps His commandments, tells the truth, and lies are not in him.

This is the condition which results from the meeting of the criteria John gave us.  Why do I say it’s a condition?  Because of the word John uses to express this idea; “esti”.  This is the Greek verb that expresses a state of being.  It is more than an action that has been performed.  Actions are the surface level evidences of the condition that exists within a person.  If we say that someone is intelligent we are communicating that the essence of their mental capacity is of a high degree.  John 1:1 gives us the sense of this: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.  John expresses the state of being of Christ three different ways, using the word “en”, which is a form of the word “esti” that he uses in our passage in 1st John.

First he says that in the beginning was the Word.  The eternality of the Word is tied to and bound up in who He is.  Then we read that the Word was with God.  His proximity to God adds an additional element to the reality of who He is because you cannot be “with” God in the sense John means unless you are in fact God.  But to ensure there is no confusion or distortion John makes it plain when he says that the Word was God, or as the Greek literally reads “God was the Word”.  Not only is He eternally with God, but He literally exists as God Himself.  They share the same essence.  Or to put in the terms we are discussing, they share the same state of being.

So, if we obey God’s commands we exist in the state of being truthful.  The truth becomes more than something we tell.  It becomes more than things we do.  It becomes a part of who we are.  In fact, I would go so far as to say it is a lesser, paler version of the character of Christ Himself.  He claimed in John 14:6: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life.”  If you guessed that this word is yet another form of our same “state of being” verb you are correct.  Jesus literally is the physical embodiment of truth.  And when we obey Him we are afforded the privilege of emulating that reality, at least to some degree.

When all of this comes together in a person, the satisfaction of God’s requirements and the transformation from a state of untruth into a state of truth, then a wonderful and mysterious consequence emerges.  John expresses this in verse 5: but whoever keeps His word, in him the love of God has truly been perfected.  Honestly, this statement is a little bewildering at first glance.  God is perfect in every way.  So how can that which is perfect be perfected?

Well, if we once again turn to the Greek behind the English we find the word “teleioo”.  This verb doesn’t really have quite the connotation we would normally associate with the idea of perfection.  We tend to think of perfect as being completely free from defects.  But “teleioo” has more of an idea of bringing to completion, accomplishing an objective, or reaching a goal.  A perfect example of this is found in Luke 2:43: and as they were returning, after spending the full number of days, the boy Jesus stayed behind in Jerusalem.  But His parents were unaware of it.  The word I have underlined is the same one translated as perfected in 1st John.  So you can see that it is carrying a very different weight and intention than how we might typically think of perfect.

At this point the immediately obvious question now becomes “How is the love of God brought to fulfillment in those who keep His word?”  I think there are at least two ways: it is experienced and it is evidenced. 

The love of God exists as a component of His personality.  It is not an entity unto itself.  Rather, it is an element of what makes Him God.  But love as it exists within God is not a solitary characteristic.  It must have a target in order to be fully expressed because it is inherently outward in scope.  Within the confines of the Godhead we can see this in the relationship between the Father, the Son, and the Spirit.  They love each other with a sacrificial affection that is visibly demonstrable.  The Father sacrifices Himself in humility to elevate the Son to a position of highest glory and honor (Philippians 2:9-11).  The Son sacrifices Himself in humility to submit His will to the Father’s plan (Philippians 2:5-8) and by leaving the world so that the Spirit can have free reign to do His work (John 16:7-11).  And the Spirit sacrifices Himself in humility to cast the spotlight on both the Father (John 16:13) and the Son (John 16:14).

Now then, with that being the shape of the love of God, when it comes to His creations it must follow the same pattern.  Meaning, it must be present and active in a person’s life in order to be brought to fulfillment.  If God says He loves us but we can see no presence of that love within us then the love of God is nothing more than an ephemeral idea floating in rivers of philosophy.  And what is the ultimate expression of His love?  I think it is clearly the redemptive work of Christ that opens the door of salvation to someone who, prior to that point, was God’s enemy.  Scripture says “Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends” in John 15:13.  So when a human being is regenerated and brought to faith in Christ, it is the best and clearest example possible that God loves him or her.  The proof of that salvation is in the doing of God’s commands, as both our passage today and John 15:14 (You are My friends if you do what I command you) makes clear.  To summarize, God’s love is brought to completion in the heart of a Christian at salvation and onward through sanctification and finally to glorification.  This truth is verified in submissive obedience to God’s commands.  Therefore, going back to 1st John, whoever guards and protects God’s instructions is proving to themselves they are redeemed, and that redemption is the greatest expression of God’s sacrificial love.  In this way the love of God is brought to fulfillment experientially.

But this completion or fulfillment of the love of God is not only inward, for verification in the Christian’s own heart.  It is also outward, for verification of God’s goodness to a watching world.  It is essentially free advertising of divine love for anyone the Christian comes into contact with.  John 13:34-35: A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one another.  By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.  Love as God defines it by His own character is so radical, so unusual, and so contrary to typical human behavior that it is startling to behold.  So Christ’s point to His apostles at the last supper was that when they love each other as He loved them first it will prove conclusively to anyone watching that they are followers of Christ.  And in turn it will point to Christ’s own loving character because Christians are to be essentially copies of Him.  Just as someone watching the Son will in effect see the Father (John 14:9) so someone watching us will in effect see the Son.  In this way the love of God is brought to fulfillment evidentially.

At this point we are finally ready to take our test.  We have met the requirements of knowing God intimately and demonstrating that knowledge through obedience.  This has had the effect of causing us to be in a condition of truthfulness.  And in that state of being God’s love for us is brought to fulfillment inwardly in the fact of our salvation and outwardly in the witness of our love for one another. 

The test is stated in verse 5b-6: By this we know that we are in Him: the one who says he abides in Him ought himself to walk in the same manner as He walked.  Let’s not beat around the bush here.  John’s point is this.  If you want to know if you are a Christian.  If you want to be convinced that your salvation is genuine.  If you want to be assured of your inheritance in heaven.  You need look no further than your own life.  What are the patterns of behavior you invest yourself in?  What are the passions that excite you?  What are the choices you take?  What are the sacrifices you make?  If these elements of your lifestyle are patterned after Jesus then that is all the evidence you need of your status as a genuine Christian.  On the other hand, if the behavior that you see in yourself is not patterned after Jesus then that is all the evidence you need of your status as a false Christian.

Notice that I said “patterned after”.  Let’s be honest here.  Christ is perfect.  He has known on sin other than what was temporarily placed on His head from the world when He was sacrificed on our behalf.  It is simply not possible for us to achieve that level of perfection.  John himself has verified that over and over in these opening lines of his letter.  We cannot say we are not sinful without being liars and being devoid of truth.  So the issue is not whether you look exactly like Christ.  What is at stake is whether you are looking more like Him over the course of time.  If you can look behind you in your own personal history of the course of your Christian life and see sanctifying progress from where you started to where you are now, then that is a visual indicator of a genuine abiding in Jesus.  And consequently, you have successfully passed John’s test.

The interesting thing about this test is that it is essentially an automatic pass.  What I mean by that is if someone has made it to the test at all they have necessarily already moved successfully through all the pre-requisite work on the preceding six pages of this essay.  And that process will have already verified their position as people who are abiding in Christ.  So the test itself functions as more of a benchmark of an already existent status rather than a true pass or fail metric.

And bound up in all this is the point of my essays for the past two weeks.  God is so wonderfully gracious that He provides us with a concrete assurance of our salvation.  He gives us the tools we need to confirm the truth of His promises to us.  There should be absolutely no reason to doubt our inheritance in heaven.  When troubles or afflictions come into our life they are there for the purpose of confirming our position and conforming our character.  They do not mean that God has abandoned us or that we have done something wrong, deserving of punishment.  Peter says it this way in 1st Peter 1:3-7: Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to obtain an inheritance which is imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you, who are protected by the power of God through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.  In this you greatly rejoice, even though now for a little while, if necessary, you have been distressed by various trials, so that the proof of your faith, being more precious than gold which is perishable, even though tested by fire, may be found to result in praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ. 


Just as ancient metallurgists used testa to separate purity from impurity and noble from base metals.  So God uses the crucible of trials to forge us into imitators of Christ.  And it is in this process of terrible pain, confident hope, and increased faith that our character is built and our redemption is verified.  

No comments:

Post a Comment